- Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Goolsbee stated that the labor market is stable, and the current policy focus is on assessing the persistence of core inflation rather than signaling a clear interest rate path.
- U.S. inflation indicators continue to deviate from the Federal Reserve's long-term target of 2%, with the CPI rising 4.2% year-on-year in May and the PCE price index rising 3.8% year-on-year in April, prompting significant concern among policymakers about price stickiness.
- Policymakers emphasize avoiding forward guidance and evaluating the potential for commodity inflation to decline after tariff reductions and the resolution of Middle East conflicts, while remaining vigilant about the persistent risks of service sector inflation.
Stable Labor Market Provides a Window for Policy Observation
In his latest statement, Chicago Fed President Goolsbee noted that given the current stability of the labor market, the Federal Reserve has more room to observe macroeconomic variables. The core focus of policy decisions has fully shifted to an in-depth assessment of inflation trends. The main challenge now is to clarify whether the inflation rate remaining in the 3% to 4% range is due to the continuation of one-time external shocks or has evolved into a more persistent long-term trend. Since employment data does not show signs of sharp deterioration, the Fed maintains a more cautious observational stance on policy adjustments to avoid premature misjudgments on the interest rate path.
Abandoning Forward Guidance to Preserve Flexibility
When discussing the monetary policy communication mechanism, Goolsbee agreed with Fed Chair Walsh's view last week on avoiding forward guidance. He did not dispute the notion that no decision-makers within the Fed support rate hikes, but emphasized that overly clear path presets could weaken policy flexibility in a complex macroeconomic context. Especially with the CPI rising 4.2% year-on-year in May and the PCE price index rising 3.8% year-on-year in April, the absolute level of inflation data remains high. By abandoning rigid forward guidance, the Federal Reserve can rely more on data-driven decisions, making dynamic adjustments based on real-time economic indicators in future policy meetings.
Commodity Inflation in the Context of Tariffs and Geopolitics
Regarding the structural factors driving price increases, policymakers have conducted a detailed analysis of the causes of inflation. Goolsbee pointed out that the price increases caused by tariff policies theoretically have a one-time nature, with their marginal impact expected to gradually fade over time. Meanwhile, the fluctuating international oil prices due to escalating Middle East geopolitical conflicts are also external supply-side shocks. If the Middle East situation can be substantively resolved in the future, external energy and commodity inflation pressures are expected to naturally decline. However, this type of commodity inflation triggered by external geopolitical and trade policies often has high volatility and unpredictability, requiring separate consideration from internal economic momentum.
Sticky Service Sector Inflation Raises Concerns Among Policymakers
Compared to commodity inflation driven by external events, the Federal Reserve's policymakers have expressed deeper concerns about the persistently high service sector inflation. Data indicates that some current inflation phenomena, especially price increases in the service sector, do not have a direct linear causal relationship with oil price surges due to the Iran conflict or tariff policies. Historically, service sector inflation is often deeply tied to domestic wage growth and internal demand, exhibiting stronger stickiness and persistence. If service sector inflation does not show clear signs of slowing, even if commodity inflation eases due to external factors, the path to reducing the overall inflation rate to the 2% target remains challenging. If core inflation rebounds, the market's pricing of the Federal Reserve maintaining a high interest rate cycle may face significant reassessment.