
Greenland held its parliamentary elections on the 11th, where the opposition Democrats emerged as the largest party with 29.9% of the vote, surpassing the incumbent "Inuit Community" party, which fell to 21.4%. Due to recent "island acquisition" remarks by former US President Trump, the issue of independence became a focal point, overshadowing discussions on livelihood issues.
Opposition Victory: Democrats Become the Largest Party
Greenland, a Danish autonomous territory, enjoys high autonomy but Denmark retains control over defense and foreign affairs. Voter turnout in this election reached 70.9%, with over 28,000 voters participating.
According to data from the election committee, the Democrats secured 29.9% of the votes, overtaking the ruling "Inuit Community" party (21.4%) as the largest party in parliament. They were followed by the Naleraq party (24.5%), the Forward party (14.7%), and the Solidarity party (7.3%). Since no party won a majority, the Democrats need to negotiate with other parties to form a coalition government.
After the election results were announced, current Prime Minister of the autonomous government, Múte Egede, expressed respect for the results and prepared for cabinet negotiations and government transition. Greenland practices a parliamentary system, and the post-election coalition government will directly impact the region's future policy direction.
Trump’s "Island Acquisition" Remarks Heighten Independence Topic
Before the election, the prospect of Greenland’s independence from Denmark became a hot topic again. Analysts noted that repeated public remarks by former US President Trump about acquiring Greenland heightened this issue.
Since last year's US presidential election, Trump has consistently shown interest in Greenland. He sent his son Donald Trump Jr. and other "representatives" to visit Greenland, stating that he would not rule out acquiring the island through "military or economic means." Prior to the current election, Trump reiterated his "welcoming" stance for Greenland to join the United States.
The German "Munich Messenger" commented that due to its strategic location and rich resources, Greenland has become a target for Trump's government's "new imperialist ambitions." However, the Danish government strongly opposes this. Danish Defense Minister Trine Bramsen clearly stated that a US annexation of Greenland "will never happen."
In Greenland, Trump's remarks were also widely resisted. A Danish media poll in January showed that 85% of Greenlanders opposed becoming part of the United States. During the election, interviewed voters generally indicated that they had no intention of becoming US citizens.
Livelihood Issues Overlooked as Voter Concerns Remain Unresolved
Despite the surge in talks about independence, analysts pointed out that Greenlanders are more concerned about daily issues such as prices, education, and healthcare. However, influenced by Trump's "island acquisition" remarks, political topics dominated the election, squeezing out discussions on social issues.
Rasmus Leander Nielsen, a political scientist at the University of Greenland, noted that this election showcased a "blend of international politics and livelihood issues." Trade and Justice Minister in the autonomous government, Naja Nathanielsen, emphasized that voters are primarily concerned with real challenges like education, healthcare, and rising prices. During campaign Q&A sessions, many residents asked about reducing living costs and improving healthcare systems rather than political issues.
Local media highlighted the three major livelihood challenges currently facing Greenland:
- Insufficient Education Resources: Many residents have to go to Denmark for education, increasing family burdens.
- High Prices: Prices of food and essential goods are high, affecting residents' quality of life.
- Limited Healthcare Conditions: There is a lack of medical facilities and a shortage of professional medical staff, leading to prominent public health issues.
Although the election focused on political topics, there is an urgent need for the Greenlandic autonomous government to prioritize the resolution of social issues to improve the living standards of its residents.

